JJH Katalog - Lichenological literature

6958

Riddle L.W. (1910): (Review of) The lichens of Minnesota - Bryologist, 13: 97-100

14159

Aptroot A. (2009): (70). Species of Anisomeridium and Mycomicrothelia, with a note on Arthopyrenia - Australasian Lichenology, 64: 22-25

New records of pyrenocarpous lichens of the genera Anisomeridium and Mycomicrothelia are reported from Australia, including four new national records. The type of Arthopyrenia picea Shirley (1889) is conspecific with the non-lichenized fungus Astrosphaeriella mauritiae K.D. Hyde & J. Fröhl. (1998), and therefore the new combination Astrosphaeriella picea (Shirley) Aptroot is made Read more...

20267

Laundon J.R. (1981): (658) Proposal to emend Chrysothrix Mont., nom. cons., and add Pulveraria Ach., nom. rej. (Lichenes) - Taxon, 30(3): 663-664

nomenclature Read more...

27460

Hawksworth D.L., Hibbett D.S., Kirk P. & Lücking R. (2016): (308–310) Proposals to permit DNA sequence data to serve as types of names of fungi - Taxon, 65(4): 899–900

Nomenclature; taxonomy. Read more...

36357

Arcadia L. in, Ahti T., Benesperi R., de Paz G.A., Divakar P.K. & Hawksworth D.L. (2024): (3013) Proposal to conserve the name Lichen pullus Schreb. (Parmelia pulla, Xanthoparmelia pulla) against L. pullus Neck. (Parmeliaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) with a conserved type - Taxon, 73(2): 633–634

The well-established name Xanthoparmelia pulla (Schreb.) O. Blanco & al. (or sometimes Neofuscelia pulla (Schreb.) Essl.) has been used to refer to a common, brown, foliose saxicolous lichen. The basionym had, however, long been considered to be Parmelia pulla Ach. (Syn. Meth. Lich.: 206. 1814), and so the type had been assumed to be an Acharian collection. A specimen of Parmelia pulla in H-ACH 1420D (= H9502152) conforming to current usage was therefore designated as lectotype by Esslinger & Ahti … Read more...

36328

Arcadia L. in (2023): (2995) Proposal to conserve the name Diplotomma chlorophaeum (Hepp ex Leight.) K.P. Singh & S.R. Singh against D. chlorophaeum Szatala (lichenized Ascomycota) - Taxon, 72(6): 1365–1366

The lichen originally described as Lecidea chlorophaea Hepp ex Leight. (Lich. Fl. Gr. Brit.: 328. 1871) belongs in Diplotomma according to current generic concepts. Szatala (in Ann. Hist.-Nat. Mus. Natl. Hung. 48: 280. 1956) intended to make the combination D. chlorophaeum, but did not cite the place of publication of Leighton’s name and consequently his combination, as such, is not validly published (Art. 41.5, Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018). However, Szatala did include a Latin description, … Read more...

35791

Andersen H.L. & Tønsberg T. (2023): (2968) Proposal to conserve the name Fuscidea against Maronea (lichenized Ascomycota) - Taxon, 72(4): 925–926

35618

Suija A. & van den Boom P. (2023): (2953) Proposal to conserve the name Absconditella against Geisleria (Ascomycota: Lecanoromycetes) - Taxon, 72(3): 660–661

34271

Fryday A.M., Søchting U., Bungartz F. & Perlmutter G. (2022): (2872) Proposal to conserve the name Huea (Ascomycota: Teloschistales) with a conserved type - Taxon, 71(2): 465–466

33815

Hestmark G. (2021): (2835) Proposal to conserve the name Umbilicaria spodochroa (lichenized Ascomycota) with a conserved type and with that spelling - Taxon, 70(5): 1131–1132